연구정보
[정책] Analysis of Government Policies on Rice Production in Thailand: A Policy Evaluation Study
태국 국외연구자료 연구보고서 - International Journal of Agriculture 발간일 : 2024-05-01 등록일 : 2024-05-09 원문링크
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the analysis of government policies on rice production in Thailand: a policy evaluation study. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The analysis of government policies on rice production in Thailand revealed that while price support policies have effectively stabilized farmers' incomes in the short term, they have also increased dependency on government subsidies, potentially stifling innovation in the agricultural sector. Furthermore, the study found that water management and technological adoption policies were beneficial in improving yields and sustainability, but their implementation was uneven across different regions. Recommendations from the study emphasized the need for a more balanced approach that reduces dependency on subsidies, enhances farmers' access to markets, and promotes sustainable agricultural practices. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Public Choice Theory, Policy Feedback Theory & Institutionalism may be used to anchor future studies on analysis of government policies on rice production in Thailand: a policy evaluation study. By implementing these practices, stakeholders can achieve more sustainable, productive, and economically viable outcomes for rice farmers and the broader agricultural community. The policy contributions of these recommendations are aimed at creating a more robust, effective, and sustainable framework for rice production in Thailand.
본 페이지에 등재된 자료는 운영기관(KIEP) 및 EMERiCs의 공식적인 입장을 대변하고 있지 않습니다.
